WW2 Relevance

|   23 September 2011

What it is to be an American

The main street, Lawrence, Kansas.

I was in Lawrence, Kansas this week, giving a lecture at the University of Kansas at the invitation of one of my former tutors from Oxford who is now Professor of History there. And it got me to thinking about American National Identity, especially – and you’ll not be surprised to hear me say this – in the context of WW2.

I’ve worked a lot in America over the last thirty years, but there is something particularly insightful about a visit to a small town like Lawrence. Coming from London one is astonished at the friendliness of most people in this part of middle America.

To give just one example from last week, I was looking to buy some toothpaste and, since the main street of Lawrence is now given over to boutiques and restaurants, finding some within walking distance of my hotel was clearly going to be a challenge. But everyone I asked was anxious to help me. One waitress went in search of her manager and both had a long discussion with me on the sidewalk about whether there was a drugstore near enough for me to get to. ‘There was one on the corner until last year,’ the manager said, ‘but it’s not there now. We ought to do something about getting one back here, downtown.’ The barista in Starbucks was equally keen to chat – also filling me in at length on the demise of the local drug store – before finally saying to me: ‘You’re not from round here, are you?’

The next morning, when I left the hotel, at least three separate people who I had chatted to about my search for toothpaste the previous day waved good morning to me. Being anonymous in London is easy. Anonymous in Lawrence quite impossible.

Any discussion about National Identity leads to generalizations, every historian knows that. But widespread travel tells us that there is such a thing as National Identity – visit Japan if you don’t believe me. And the various component parts of American National Identity I detected over the years in places like Lawrence – friendliness, optimism, self-confidence – was exactly how many British people described American GIs when they came to Britain during the war. But there is something else, which you don’t discover unless you cross these people. Which is a ruthless belief that right is on their side, and that they will pursue to the last anyone who attacks them and their fundamental, unshakable values.

The Japanese found that out during WW2. Their government had believed that after the humiliation of Pearl Harbor, America would seek some kind of compromise peace. But anyone who knew the American National Identity was aware that judgment was devastatingly flawed. Convinced that righteousness was on their side, armed with a total absence of self-doubt, the Americans would fight to the bitter end.

WW2 Relevance

|   18 September 2011

Arbeit Macht Frei

Arbeit Macht Frei inscribed on the main gate of Dachau concentration camp

‘Arbeit Macht Frei’ (‘work makes you free’) must be one of the most infamous phrases in the world. But, I thought, as I filmed at the site of Dachau concentration camp this week, the origin of this phrase is often misunderstood.

The words are almost exclusively known because the commandant of Auschwitz, Rudolf Hoess, placed them on a giant iron banner above the entrance to Auschwitz main camp. Here they were to take on the meaning of a black, cynical joke, since ‘work’ most certainly did not make the vast majority of the Auschwitz inmates ‘free’ – in fact, work or the gas chambers killed more than a million of them.

But what a visit to Dachau reminds us, is that this was not necessarily how the Nazis originally saw the meaning of this phrase at all. ‘Arbeit Macht Frei’, which was emblazoned on the gates of Dachau in 1936, four years before Auschwitz main camp was constructed, was the title of a nineteenth century novel by Lorenz Diefenbach about the idea of redemption through work. And this notion of the power of work to reclaim ‘degenerates’ was what the most powerful commandant of Dachau, Theodore Eicke, saw as the purpose of concentration camps before the war.

Close up of Arbeit Macht Frei at Dachau

The concentration camp of Dachau, outside Munich in southern Germany, established shortly after the Nazis came to power in January 1933, was not designed to murder people en masse – nor were most people who were sent there in the Nazis’ early years Jewish. Most were political prisoners, and though a minority of people sent to Dachau before the war did die there – often after appalling mistreatment by the SS guards – the majority did not. They went into the camp and were, as the Nazis saw it, brutally ‘re-educated’ and then released back into society.

Eicke, one of the most gifted sadists who has ever lived, devised a routine designed to break the spirit of the prisoners. Yes, there was physical brutality, but often the worst form of torture was mental. For example, if you were sent to Dachau you were never told when – or if – you might be released. Most prisoners served a sentence of around eighteen months, but some were there for less time and some never regained their freedom. Rudolf Hoess, who trained under Eicke at Dachau, later wrote how this uncertainty played with the minds of the inmates.

As a result, Hoess, I believe, thought that the phrase ‘Arbeit Macht Frei’ was almost a ‘help’ – an ‘inspiration’ of you like – to concentration camp prisoners (and remember that Auschwitz was a concentration camp before it became a death camp). Hoess, who had been imprisoned for an act of appalling political violence himself before the Nazis came to power, always remembered how it was the chance to work as a prisoner that had helped get him through his period behind bars. And since concentration camp prisoners were forced to work, then this ‘distraction’ would, Hoess thought, make them ‘free’ inside their minds. There was also, of course, the more obvious meaning to the phrase – if you ‘worked’ as the Nazis wanted in Dachau, behaving as a good German National Socialist Worker, then you did stand a chance, before the war, of being released and ‘free’ from the camp.


Arbeit Macht Frei above the gate of Auschwitz main camp

However, I think Eicke wanted the inmates of Dachau to read something else into the iron sign ‘Arbeit Macht Frei’ which he placed on the gates of Dachau. I think it was another attempt to cynically eat into the minds of the inmates. Each day they saw the sign and thought ‘will I be free today?’ and ‘will I ever be free?’

It’s a reminder that the Nazis were not just brutal thugs. Many of them were extremely clever thugs as well.

WW2 Controversies

|   7 September 2011

Why fight in Italy?

Florence – liberated in the summer of 1944

We’ve just added to the site for subscribers a video about the war in Italy.

I’ve always felt strongly about this campaign because my father-in-law fought in it. And the more I learn about this history the harder I find it to justify the sacrifice made by our soldiers. The fundamental problem the Allies faced in Italy had to do with the realities of geography. As Napoleon said, ‘Italy is like a boot. You have to enter it from the top.’ Read the rest of this entry

WW2 Reviews

|   2 September 2011

Ian Kershaw and ‘The End’

A quite astonishing book

Many years ago, when I was on a BBC film directors course, the instructor came in to the cutting room to view the short historical documentary I had just made. He watched it once and then listed at least half a dozen things that were wrong with it – quite something given that the film was only five minutes long. I was depressed, my head hung low, when he patted me on the back and said, ‘Don’t worry, Laurence, just remember this – criticism is easy, creation is hard.’

I thought of those words reading Ian Kershaw’s latest book ‘The End’, about the last year or so of Hitler’s Germany. Because I believe that you can divide historians and the books they write into two sorts – there are those that are essentially critics and those that are essentially creators. And, perhaps needless to say, there are many more critics out there than creators. It is much easier to criticize other works of history, or to explain why a particular historical or philosophical theory has flaws, than to create a new way of understanding the past. Read the rest of this entry

WW2 Competitions

|   1 September 2011

Summer Competition result


The winner receives all these books (plus ‘Their Darkest Hour’)

Congratulations to Andy Dixon of Cheshire who was the first WW2History.com subscriber chosen at random from all those who gave the correct answer to the summer competition.

The question posed was this: What was the name of the Japanese Admiral who was the architect of the attack on Pearl Harbor, and would be killed when his plane was shot down by the Americans in 1943?

And the answer was: Isoroku Yamamoto.

The prize of signed paperback copies of all 5 of my WW2 books will shortly be winging its way to Cheshire.

This autumn’s competition for subscribers has a stunning prize – a signed, hardback, first edition of Professor Sir Ian Kershaw’s brilliant new book about the final year of Hitler’s Germany: ‘The End’. Good luck to all who enter!

WW2 Relevance

|   27 August 2011

The Somme and Auschwitz

Graveyard on the Somme

This week I was flying in a helicopter over Germany and France filming material for my next TV series, which will transmit in Autumn 2012. And I was most affected by a place I have been many times before – the battlefield of the Somme. (And before you ask the relevance of the Somme to WW2, I should say that I was there because Hitler was wounded at the battle of the Somme in 1916). Read the rest of this entry

WW2 Relevance

|   10 August 2011

Where riots once led

The Metropolitan riot police.

I’ve just returned from South East Asia to news of these terrible riots across England. They’re unlike anything I can remember in this country in my lifetime. So many people we know have been affected. A friend of my daughter’s, for instance, woke up to find that thugs had burned her car. And shops that we all frequent in Ealing in West London have been looted.

But looking at the press coverage and the comments of politicians also makes me think of the relevance of these English riots to one of the most crucial questions of the last century. Which is this: how was it possible that millions of law-abiding Germans turned to the Nazis – who openly preached the importance of using violence against their opponents – in 1932? At first sight it seems almost impossible to understand how ordinary citizens who wanted to lead a peaceful, quiet life could willingly vote for a political party that so valued thuggery. Read the rest of this entry

WW2 Anniversary

|   27 July 2011

70th anniversary of a dark day in history

The gate to the main camp at Auschwitz, through which the sick prisoners marched.

Exactly 70 years ago tomorrow, on 28 July 1941, an event of great tragedy and great significance took place. The very first Auschwitz prisoners were selected to be gassed. But in a piece of history which symbolizes the complex history of the camp, these prisoners were not selected because they were Jews, and they were not murdered in Auschwitz, but transported back to Germany to be killed. Read the rest of this entry

WW2 Relevance

|   20 July 2011

Courageous Italians

Monument to the Italian soldiers massacred by the Germans on Kefalonia.

The Italian army is not remembered as the bravest collection of soldiers in WW2. The attitude of many people towards them is summed up by a ‘joke’ a former member of the SS Das Reich division told me.  “Heard about the new Italian tank?’ he said. ‘It has five gears – four of them reverse.’

But, I thought, as I traveled last week through Kefalonia, the largest of the Greek Ionian Islands, this sense that collectively the Italians lacked bravery is simply not fair to their memory. Not enough people know, for example, what happened on Kefalonia in September 1943. Read the rest of this entry

WW2 Relevance

|   9 July 2011

Secrets of Japanese history

Why did the Japanese behave as they did in WW2?

I’ve been thinking a lot about Japan lately. In part it has been a purely selfish interest – the book I wrote some years ago on the Japanese in World War II, called ‘Horror in the East’ has at last been published in paperback. But revisiting this subject has also made me think about the origins of Japanese National Identity, and in particular the effect of geography on the Japanese.

Read the rest of this entry